Hey be careful with the accidental implication. There are indeed multiple competitions in parallel, some based on Anker's decisions on ability to test a product, some on random luck. You will get some who in some period of time happen to win on ability and win on luck. That may feel unfair but to "fix" that would imply Anker would have to downgrade from fair even chance in the random luck based competitions if someone had won in the ability based campaigns, which would then penalize someone for being both able and lucky. That would be akin to someone who was happen to be driving an expensive car from being free to buy a lotto ticket.
You are at risk, either deliberate or I assume accidental or causing others to misinterpret, of crossing a line. We had one member who felt things were unfair about a month ago, it got "pear shaped" for a few days.
Anker's "testing" competitions are based on how well you respond with a test plan and how well social media you are, and how good you are at reviewing. Those tend to be ability based. There are competitions on sheer random luck. Sometimes someone wins in both but the implications of trying to even out the chances means a person can become penalized, for say talent, as they were also winning by, say, random luck around the same time.