I have been giving this some more thought.
If Anker wants to develop its own charging technology “IQ2” which is not QC and not Apple and not anything else, but it has a common denominator which overlaps the others, then:
- you can buy an IQ2 Powerport which will recharge an IQ2 Powercore faster
- no licenses, no specific ports for specific charging tech
- total power budget is shared.
So you can imagine a product like this:
- Powerport2 IQ2. Total 24W.
- If one of the ports is connected to a Powercore IQ2 then it can output upto 18W so faster recharge that Powercore, and the balance of the 8W remaining to the other port to non-IQ2 (like a phone, BT headphones, etc).
So you’d then in the situation the Powerport2 does not need to be any larger (it is still 24W) but if you gave it problem like fast recharge a Powercore IQ2, it would do so.
Then scale on up through to the Powerport4, with a 40W total budget
- Up to 2 ports can fully output 18W each, 36W total, so could full 18W each recharge two Powercore, or a dual-input Powercore TBA.
- The other 2 ports have 4W budget left.
So instead of total Wattage from a Powerport potentially going to waste, so long as you use it to recharge a Powercore, it more significantly gets used.
Then it would be powerful.
You’d then have a dense efficient total charging system.
If it was like-QC4 and like-PD then it would be also useful to those other context too.
That is what I’m thinking - Powercore IQ2 with Powerport IQ2 will work faster together, but not on a specific port, but any port, and use whatever power budget left to the other ports.