thanks for the blog info for.me , i was looking to changing my blog site
In my testing I found Anker AAA packing 10% more capacity than Energizer AAA (1289 mAh vs 1164 mAh)
That’s pretty huge for AAA battery. Well done Anker
I thought mAh wasn’t true capacity?
Hahahaha me n my fat thumbs!
Least this time it was a good accident.
Asside from buying online, i usually would buy the 24 packs or 36 pack from a store which run anywhere from 15.99 to 20.99. And with Anker seemingly lasting longer and you get more batteries its a no brainer. Cost per each battery is much better than Duracell or Energizer, so Anker wins hands down
Costco has 72 batteries for $20… iirc these are just rebranded energizer battery’s. Much better deal then any other lol
Sorry but the kirkland batteries are NOT energizer, but they are Duracell’s.
Oh yeah. That’s why i said “if I remember correctly”. I wasn’t positive lol. Either way it’s a good solid brand
Thank you for the thorough review. I’ve been thinking about getting these batteries, now I think I will try them out. I love the packaging too!
Ahh, he found something that’s cheaper in the U.K.!
I’m sure Duracell trade would be cheaper in USA also.
Trade are best cos it’s the same ginger battery but sold in bulk.
comparing 2 like batteries (same operating voltage) - it is ok to use mAh
for dissimilar batteries - use Wh
Again your trying to compare the cost of 24 batteries to 48 batteries with Anker
Wonder if they will start supplying Tesla batteries
Possibilities are endless!!! May be batteries or may be the power car itself
The photo is quite obvs 48 batteries
I just looked at the box which says 24, didnt read the title at 48. Regardless id still take anker for lasting longer
This is my opinion as well