Hi, new member here. I’ve been researching for some time now and have a few questions I’d like to ask before purchasing a new charger for my LG G4 phones (2).
-
Does anybody have any knowledge or know from experience that if I want to charge two phones at the same time would I achieve better results using one brick per phone or 1 dual port brick? I only have access to the 1 wall plug in vicinity to where I’ll be charging said phones. I need both ports on the Anker adapter to be quick charge 2.0 minimum but 3.0 if available.
-
I’ve read that my phones circuitry only supports quick charge 2.0 and even though i can use a 3.0 brick that would have Intelligent Negotiation for Optimum Voltage for efficiency, “charging” would still be at 2.0 rates with added efficiency to counter overheating issues during charging. What I would like to know is that if the Anker power adapters that say Qualcomm quick charge 3.0, does that mean that all the ports are 3.0 or only the ports that are outlined in “Q/lightning bolt/3” symbol? It seems the current lineup doesn’t offer adapters that yield two 3.0 ports.
-
Does the same concept go for Power IQ? Port or whole brick?
-
Is “voltage boost” specific or is that technology on all Anker chargers?
-
in terms of hierarchy of quality or evolution in Anker products in regards to wall chargers am I correct in that it goes as follows: Powerport, Powerport Speed, Powerport +?
-
In regards to the previous question, it seems Powerport Speed models are the best in terms of having all 3 technologies of “quick charge, IQ, and voltage boost” therefore this would be the premium model without the look and feel of the Powerport + body?
-
As others have stated, it’s important to use an Anker wall charger with a good quality micro usb cable, are there cable generations (ex1.0, 2.0) or technologies that make one superior to the other excluding physical characteristics such as reinforced stress points, double braided nylon? I can’t seem to find clear defined charging superiority in one vs. the other.