We will see in a few months, thanks guys 
BREAKING: Several Exciting New Releases!
Yeah $80 would be too much for me too. I would love to have one of these for my suitcase or my office, but for that price I’m going to have to pass.
Both of those pods look real sharp. Looks way more comfortable that apple earpods.
2 Likes
I got a 60W PD charger this week, regular price $36. 100W should be… $60 … just guessing. They probably are the same vintage technology given how huge is the 100W. 60W is 6.9cuin so you’d expect 100W about 11.5cuin but the Atom 4 is 15.9cuin.
Keep coming back to there is either an error in the Amazon listing or something very bad happened in the design.
The good news is it is unavailable while Anker figures it out.
1 Like
What makes the PowerPort+2 different than the others just like it? @Jesse_Hernandez1 so I get the difference between these is wattage, but the one posted doesn’t say how many watts. USB C Charger, Anker PowerPort Speed+ Duo Wall Charger with 30W Power Delivery Port for iPhone Xs/Max/XR/X/8, iPad Pro 2018/Air 2/Mini, MacBook Pro/Air 2018, Galaxy S9/S8, Pixel, LG, Nexus, and More https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07H54MKQY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_rOsACb88VYBQQ Anker USB C Charger with USB-C to USB Adapter, PowerPort II, UL Certified 49.5W Wall Charger with Foldable Plug, PD for MacBook, iPhone XS/Max/XR/X/8/7/6/Plus, PowerIQ 2.0 for S9/S8/Plus and More https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07HN644KC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_dSsACb36DHBS6
And they made the couple little upgrades on the Neo that they were “lacking” compared to Apple’s AirPods. Like instant connection, pair it once then when you take it out it auto pairs. Also they upgraded the mic and sound, apparently…the Atom PP4 is getting trashed because of the price before it even comes out! Don’t these people know, just wait it’ll be on sale. Lol
1 Like
You really should pay attention to specs as it says it all about the products.
The Power Port+2 is different from the first link you posted because it has IQ 2.0 which allows 18w charging via USB-A. It’s also an in between because the USB-C output isn’t as high as the second link you posted, the pp+2 outputs USB-C (Power Delivery) Output: 5V==3A/9V==2A
I’d0
4 Likes
In this case it’s actually only 15W output via PowerIQ 2.0.
Yea actually I do pay attention, but it can all be very confusing, like yea it says 100W, but that’s split between 2 USB Cs and 2 USB A outputs, meaning unless you charge only one device at a time via C, THEN you’ll get 100W. Yea I get that it’s a lot of power to spread around the 4 ports, but this is where Anker sometimes runs into problems, the way they advertise a thing sometimes gives people the wrong impression…don’t get me wrong, I can read, I can see that if you plug in 2+ devices you will NOT get 100W to each, but a lot of people miss that, then give it bad ratings. Also, I was legitimately asking because like I said the way they are advertised can be misleading or misinterpreted. So Thanks for the Reply, I guess, but next time maybe try to be more helpful than giving me attitude.
I see your point and to some degree I agree with you. It also falls on the costumer to do some research and choose the best charger for their needs. I know I do, just to avoid future issues
1 Like
Yea so that’s sort of my point is that most customers don’t research before buying, then give the product an unfair low rating or post complaints when it is totally their fault. So what I was trying to say was that maybe Anker could start to be more specific about what does what, i.e Quickcharge 1.0,2, 3 , iQ, QI, PD, and like how wattage is split between devices like on a 4 port 100w charger, I bet most people expect 100w from all 4 ports at the same time, which is not the case. Does Anker NEED to do this, no. Would they be doing something barely any other company does, yes. Even the post that @AnkerOfficial made about “How to choose your PD” is a huge step towards what I am talking about, it just needs to be on the product site too.
1 Like
@Chris_Renshaw my apologies I wasn’t try to pester or give you attitude. Your previous post you asked what makes them different, you mentioned they look the same and had the same wattage so what’s different. All I did was mention it’s in the specs if you look, same goes for anyone looking to buy stuff should never base it in looks alone but specs
2 Likes
I knew the differences between the ones I posted. I was asking what is what am I missing about the one you posted the PP PD+2, these names are getting ridiculous, lol. I see that it has IQ2, but the PD Wattage is not listed…
Yea perhaps they also need to better name their products lol
2 Likes
lol i literally just said that to someone in a different post! haha
Great minds think alike 
It did not send me to a link when I l clicked it, all the info I had to go on was what is in the pic.
It’s a common problem too many products similar names takes a focus or luck.
Perhaps we give out Anker Powercore Diploma? 
2 Likes
That was myself, Amazon has the 49.5w unit :
Only to put a link to a New unit:
that is Not a 49.5w charger but a 42w charger, if one was not careful it could be easily missed with so many chargers that look alike, and with it stating 30w Power Delivery Port which is exactly what the 49.5w unit is but Only 12w usb Not 19.5w like the 49.5w unit.
2 Likes
I own the 49.5w charger and I love it so far. Just need a battery bank now for those long flights
1 Like